The ground reports itself, weeks before anyone files.

Construction stage, thermal output and yard activity are observable from orbit on a repeating cadence. Nuclir resolves that observation onto assets already in the model.

The only source that does not depend on disclosure.

Every other input here exists because someone chose to publish it. Orbital observation does not: a site is imaged whether or not its operator has filed anything, on a cadence set by orbits rather than by reporting calendars. For anything under construction, that is often the only current source there is.

It is also the source that resolves disputes between the others. When a permit says one thing and a corporate statement says another, the slab either exists or it does not - which is why it carries disproportionate weight in entity resolution.

Progress, heat, and activity.

Optical and radar passes read construction stage: earthworks, foundations, steel, envelope, and the substation next to it. Thermal bands read whether a plant is running and roughly how hard, which is a production signal that no filing carries at that frequency.

Activity reads movement - vehicles in a yard, containers on a pad, vessels at a berth. Aggregated over passes it is a utilisation series for an asset, and joined to the logistics record it becomes a shipment that has or has not left.

Four things orbit sees before a filing does.

Each is resolved onto an entity already in the model, with the pass date attached - an observation without its timestamp is not evidence.

Construction progress

Earthworks through commissioning, which is the only current schedule signal for most sites under build.

Thermal signatures

Whether industrial plant is running, at a frequency no disclosure regime matches.

Yard and berth activity

Vehicles, containers and vessels, aggregated into a utilisation series per asset.

Change detection

What differs between passes, which is how a new line, a new pad or a stalled site is found without being looked for.

Cloud, cadence, and what an image cannot say.

Optical passes are defeated by cloud, revisit rates vary by latitude and by constellation, and radar sees through weather at the cost of interpretability. A responsible answer therefore carries its observation date and its confidence, and Nuclir shows both rather than smoothing them into a clean series.

An image also cannot read intent. It shows that a building exists, not what will run in it or who has contracted for the output - which is precisely why it is one input among six rather than a product on its own, and why the rest of the intelligence layer sits around it.

Evidence that keeps pace with the decision.

Evaluate Nuclir against the systems, markets, and decisions that matter to your organization. The result is current intelligence with the context needed to use it responsibly.

Request access Speak with the team